Tuesday, May 30, 2017

Section 79, Captive Insurance, 419, 412i Plans, Dont go to arbitration Sue


Section 79, Captive Insurance, 419, 412i Plans, Don’t go to arbitration Sue


Thomas, Francis, Edward, and Dolores Ehlen1("the Ehlens") are employees of Ehlen Floor Covering, Inc. ("Ehlen Floor"). In 2002, Ehlen Floor created a 412(I) employee benefit pension plan, the Ehlen Floor Coverings Retirement Plan ("the Plan"), with the help of advisors and administrators. IPS, a corporation specializing in pension plan design and administration for small businesses, took over as the Plan administrator at the start of 2003. As part of the commencement of IPS's services, Edward Ehlen, in his capacity as president of Ehlen Floor, signed an Arbitration Addendum ("AA") attached to an Administrative Services Agreement ("the Agreement") between IPS and Ehlen Floor. The AA called for arbitration of "any claim arising out of the rendition or lack of rendition of services under [the] [A]greement." The Agreement provided a list of available services that IPS could provide, such as performing annual reviews of the Plan, making amendments, and preparing annual report forms. The Agreement also stated that Ehlen Floor would indicate in Section VI of the Agreement which of the available services it desired for IPS to actually perform. There is no Section VI in the Agreement, nor is there any testimony or evidence that plaintiffs ever viewed a Section VI of the Agreement.
Shortly after IPS stepped in as administrator of the Plan, it became aware that the Plan was not in compliance with several Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") rules and regulations. IPS contends that it drafted an amendment to correct these flaws, but the amendment was never officially adopted. In 2004, the IRS promulgated new rules explaining that it would consider 412(i) plans with beneficiary payout limitations to be listed transactions2, possibly subject to serious penalties. The rule required any plans that could be considered listed transactions to file Form 8886 to avoid potential penalties. IPS drafted another amendment to the Plan after determining that the Plan would likely be classified as a listed transaction under the new rules. Ehlen Floor was not informed about the pre-rule tax problems, the existence of the new rule, the additional filing requirements that the new rule imposed, or the drafting of the new amendment. The IRS instigated an audit on March 6, 2006, found the Plan to be non-compliant, and ultimately assessed significant penalties against Ehlen Floor.
In August 2007, plaintiffs filed a complaint in state court against a number of parties involved with the creation and initial administration of the Plan, asserting claims of negligence, fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, negligent supervision, breaches of fiduciary duties, and unfair and deceptive trade practices. The case was removed to federal court on the basis of preemption under ERISA. In May 2009, as requested by the court, plaintiffs recast their complaints as federal matters in their Second Amended Complaint, but plaintiffs contested the removal and argued against federal jurisdiction. IPS was added as a defendant in the Second Amended Complaint. IPS then moved to compel arbitration of the dispute, claiming that the terms of the AA govern the matter. The district court denied the motion. IPS appeals; plaintiffs cross-appeal to challenge the existence of federal jurisdiction.
II. STANDARD

Innovative Pension Strategies, Inc. ("IPS") appeals the district court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration and stay plaintiffs' claims against it. Plaintiffs cross-appeal, disputing the preemption of their claims under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") and alleging a lack of federal jurisdiction. We find that jurisdiction is proper and affirm the district court's denial of IPS's motion to compel arbitration.


We therefore affirm the district court's denial of IPS's motion to compel arbitration and to stay plaintiffs' claims against it.
Lance Wallach can be reached at: WallachInc@gmail.com
For more information, please visit www.taxadvisorexperts.org Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, financial, international tax, and estate planning.  He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR, and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Pubic Radio’s All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit www.taxadvisorexperts.com.




The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.


2 comments:

  1. While I strongly recommend you read my more detailed summaries, the following are the main bullet points explaining why you should stay away from these plans:

    1) You have to lie to employees to implement them.

    2) The life illustrations given by ignorant or crooked insurance agents are not realistic (most use today’s historically low lending rates with 2-3% loan spreads on variable loans on EIUL policies (ones that do not have a fixed lending rate)).

    3) You have to be a C-Corporation to use them.

    4) The life policies sold in these plans are so bad that the companies don’t want them sold unless they are in Section 79 plans (the policies are designed to have poor performance so the income tax deduction is increased).

    5) Another very good reason not to use these plans is because there are better alternatives like Captive Insurance Companies (click here to learn the power of growing wealth through a CIC).

    6) And the best reason not to use a Section 79 plan is because when you run the real numbers the client would be better off NOT funding the plan, taking his/her money home after taxes, and funding a “good” EIUL policy (a Retirement Life™ policy).

    Conclusion

    If you are an insurance agent and are being told by an IMO or insurance company that you need to start selling Section 79 plans so you can get in the business market and make a bunch of money, resist the sales pitch. If you are a business owner being pitched a plan, resist the sales pitch.

    If you’ve been told this is a can’t-miss program, have them give you what they think is a good illustration for a client and forward it to me

    ReplyDelete

  2. 419 Life Insurance Plans and Other Scams – Large IRS Fines – The IRS Raids Plan Promoter Benistar, and What Does All This Mean To You? | 419e-attorneys.com
    419 Life Insurance Plans and Other Scams – Large IRS Fines – The IRS Raids Plan Promoter Benistar, and What Does All This Mean To You? | 419e-attorneys.com
    Posted by Lance Wallach at 5/14/2015 08:19:00 AM
    Email This
    BlogThis!
    Share to Twitter
    Share to Facebook
    Share to Pinterest

    Labels: 412i, 412i Benefit Plan, 412i Plan, 419, 419 lawsuits, 419 Litigation, 419 Plan, abusive tax shelters, audits, Lance Wallach, Lance Wallach Expert Witness, Welfare Benefit Plan
    2 comments:

    Robert ShermanMarch 7, 2016 at 5:52 PM
    Benistar
    Benistar 419 Plan
    Grist Mill Trust
    Nova
    Niche
    Sea Nine Veba
    SADI Trust
    Beta 419
    Millennium
    Bisys
    Creative Services Group
    Sterling Benefit Plan
    Compass 419
    Niche 419
    CRESP
    American Benefits Trust
    National Benefit Plan and Trust
    ABT
    Professional Benefits Trust
    Old Mutual
    Allmerica Financial
    American Heritage Life
    Commercial Union Life
    National Life of Vermont
    Old Line Life
    Security Mutual Life
    West Coast Life
    ECI Pension Services
    Pension Professionals of America
    ABI
    Hartford
    AIG
    Indy Life
    Indianapolis Life
    Advantage
    Jacksom National
    Jefferson-Pilot Life
    Lincoln Benefit Life
    Lincoln National Life
    Manufacturers Life
    Massachusetts Mutual
    Metropolitan Life
    Midland Life
    Minnesota Mutual
    Principal Life
    Reliastar
    Security Mutual
    USG Annuity & Life
    Western Reserve Life Assurance
    Old Mutual
    Allmerica Financial
    American Heritage Life
    Commercial Union Life
    National Life of Vermont
    Old Line Life
    Security Mutual Life
    West Coast Life
    For Help With Any of T

    Reply

    Robert ShermanMarch 7, 2016 at 5:52 PM
    Benistar
    Benistar 419 Plan
    Grist Mill Trust
    Nova
    Niche
    Sea Nine Veba
    SADI Trust
    Beta 419
    Millennium
    Bisys
    Creative Services Group
    Sterling Benefit Plan
    Compass 419
    Niche 419
    CRESP
    American Benefits Trust
    National Benefit Plan and Trust
    ABT
    Professional Benefits Trust
    Old Mutual
    Allmerica Financial
    American Heritage Life
    Commercial Union Life
    National Life of Vermont
    Old Line Life
    Security Mutual Life
    West Coast Life
    ECI Pension Services
    Pension Professionals of America
    ABI
    Hartford
    AIG
    Indy Life
    Indianapolis Life
    Advantage
    Jacksom National
    Jefferson-Pilot Life
    Lincoln Benefit Life
    Lincoln National Life
    Manufacturers Life
    Massachusetts Mutual
    Metropolitan Life
    Midland Life
    Minnesota Mutual
    Principal Life
    Reliastar
    Security Mutual
    USG Annuity & Life
    Western Reserve Life Assurance
    Old Mutual
    Allmerica Financial
    American Heritage Life
    Commercial Union Life
    National Life of Vermont
    Old Line Life
    Security Mutual Life
    West Coast Life
    For Help With Any of

    ReplyDelete