Question: I have not been filing the Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) despite having a filing requirement. Should I file amended income tax returns reporting and paying the tax owed and file FBARs going forward instead of entering into the Offshore Voluntary Initiative Program (OVDI)?
Answer: The above technique is known as a quiet disclosure. Quiet disclosures are admonished by the IRS. The IRS has a FAQ section for its 2012 OVDI program. In FAQ Number 15 and 16, the IRS explicitly states that it will closely monitor these late filed amended returns to determine whether enforcement action is appropriate. The IRS goes on to state that it may, if criminal tax evasion is evident, refer the matter to the Department of Justice. In March 2013, the US Government Accountability Office (“GAO”), released a report, GAO-13-318, about offshore tax evasion. In the report, the GAO stated that quiet disclosures undermine the incentive to participate in OVDI. The IRS concurred with the GAO’s report and acknowledged that it will utilize methods to effectively detect and pursue taxpayers deciding to execute quiet disclosures.
n our experience, good facts applied to the law will result in a good opt out result. IRS agent provides a written submission regarding a proposed penalty resolution to a committee of senior IRS personnel, who then decide on the nature and extent of any ensuing examination. In many cases, the committee accepts the IRS agent recommendation.
ReplyDeleteWhen a penalty does not change through an opt out there is still hope because an appeal is available to contest an OVDI opt-out penalty. Opt outs are essentially audits, and audit determinations can be appealed in the same manner as lesser court rulings, and in many cases, the Office of Appeals overturns (or at least modifies) the findings of the original audit in the taxpayer’s favor.
The IRS understands that many taxpayers will not agree with the findings of its auditors. Therefore, it has created a separate branch of service called the Office of Appeals, which consists of approximately 2,000 employees located nationwide. Most of them were auditors themselves, at one time, but are now senior employees in the IRS system, and they usually have legal or accounting experience. Their sole function is to review finished examination reports and provide an impartial platform for taxpayers to plead their cases to a higher power within the IRS. They attempt to avoid litigation by resolving tax disputes internally in a way that foments future voluntary taxpayer compliance with the tax laws.
Appeals officers have greater authority and flexibility in deciding cases than auditors. Their competence is in fact judged by how often they are able to reach a successful compromise with taxpayers, and not by their willingness to back an auditor’s findings.
Regardless, while opting out of the OVDI or OVDP amnesty programs may result in a reduction of penalties that may otherwise be assessed, the taxpayer needs to carefully weigh the numerous consequences before doing so. Responsible tax professionals should discuss the consequences of opting out with the client before making such a recommendation.
ReplyDelete---- To download a checklist of required information, click here.
June 30 2014 is the annual deadline for U.S. taxpayers, (including resident aliens) to timely reports of foreign financial accounts for year ending 2013. (Note that the reports must be received by that date so we advise sending them in a couple of weeks prior to that date). The report form (TD 90-22.1) known as an FBAR is due if a U.S. taxpayer has direct or indirect control over an offshore financial account (such as a bank / brokerage account or other investment, broadly defined) that had an account balance/s in aggregate of $10,000 or more at any time during the calendar year.
Failure to file and for the IRS to receive an FBAR by June 30 may result in penalties which range from a warning letter (for reasonable cause) to $10,000 per year per account for "non-willful" violations (late but otherwise accurate filing not excused for reasonable cause), to the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the account balance per year per account for "willful" failure to file (knowing and intentional or willfully blind conduct) to criminal prosecution.
There is an increasing likelihood that the IRS will seek the "willful" civil penalties for taxpayer's who have failed to file FBAR for years prior to 2012 and who have failed to come forward and enter the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program. The reasons for this are as follows:
First, since 2009 there have been three (3) formal opportunities for U.S. taxpayers to come forward. There was the 2009, 2011, 2012 and now the 2013 programs.
Second, offshore banks have been sending out letters to U.S. based account holders requesting that they attest to compliance with FBAR reporting and closing some accounts for non-compliance. The due diligence provisions Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) are now in effect and offshore banks with U.S. correspondent banking agreements are scouring their records for U.S. account holders. These banks are requesting consent from U.S. account holders to disclose information about the U.S. account holder to the IRS.
Third, The Justice Department has brought actions against several offshore banks, Switzerland, Luxembourg, and Israel to compel disclosure of information about U.S. account holders.
Finally, beginning with 2011, Form 1040 has specific questions on Schedule B about whether the taxpayer filed an FBAR. Yet, in spite of all of the information many U.S. taxpayers, including those who are resident aliens have refused to come forward. Some of the reasons for not coming forward are fear based, and some based upon risk/reward estimates. In each case the outcome if caught is so terrible, that it is hard to imagine why anyone would refuse to come forward.
However, in the following situations it is overwhelmingly likely that you will caught – and as in most things of this nature, the consequences will largely be determined by who gets to whom first:
Example 1: Taxpayers are resident aliens who claim to have inherited funds in excess of $100,000 somewhat recently. The funds were kept in an offshore account and not reported for either income tax or FBAR purposes. Here are the potential results. First, a Report of Foreign Gift or Beque
ReplyDeleteExample 2: Taxpayer has an offshore corporation which is used to provide inflated or false invoices so that the taxpayer can move money offshore and deduct the payment. The taxpayer owns the company directly or indirectly (such as through a trust or nominee) but has full control over the bank accounts. The taxpayer did not File FBAR's or attach a Controlled Foreign Corporation return (Form 5471) to his Form 1040. In this case the taxpayer faces potential criminal prosecution for both income tax evasion and willful failure to file FBAR's. The risk of prosecution and the penalties for tax evasion (75% of evaded tax) and FBAR willfulness penalties can be avoided if the taxpayer makes a timely offshore voluntary disclosure. The cost benefit surely tilts in favor of disclosure.
Example 3: Taxpayer is considering applying for an EB-5 Visa (investor Visa). Before entering the program the taxpayer should obtain a legal opinion on how to properly comply with disclosure requirements for holdings in financial accounts and other interests. The failure to properly comply with FBAR and income tax reporting rules can be grounds for revocation of the visa. Once the EB-5 or any other visa that results in permanent resident status is issued, the FBAR and other compliance rules and penalties apply.
THE BOTTOM LINE: Bank secrecy is over. The best advice we can give is for you to “come clean” ASAP. WE will be more than pleased to help you. Our fees are reasonable and we work with top tax lawyers to secure the best possible outcome for you.
“The days of bank secrecy are over. The computers are taking to each other and the banks are turning over information to the IRS. The sooner you take steps to resolve your situation, the better the outcome is likely to be” ~ Selwyn Gerber CPA & Richard Weisinger CPA
NOTE: In addition to the FBAR, you should be careful to file forms 8938 and 3520 / 3520A as appropriate for foreign investments.