IRS tax relief firm, Lance Wallach, speaking at attorney CPA's convention on abusive tax shelters, benefit retirement plans

IRS Penalties, Audits, Benefit Plans 419e 412i

IRS tax relief firm, Lance Wallach, speaking at attorney CPA's convention on abusive tax shelters, benefit retirement plans, 419e 412i plans, material advisor penalties, IRS audits, and expert witness tax court cases.

Small business retirement plans fuel litigation

By Lance Wallach, CLU, ChFC, CIMC

             

Small business retirement plans fuel litigation

Small businesses facing audits and potentially huge tax penalties over certain types of retirement plans are filing lawsuits against those who marketed, designed and sold the plans. The 412(i) and 419(e) plans were marketed in the past several years as a way for small business owners to set up retirement or welfare benefits plans while leveraging huge tax savings, but the IRS put them on a list of abusive tax shelters and has more recently focused audits on them.
The penalties for such transactions are extremely high and can pile up quickly - $100,000 per individual and $200,000 per entity per tax year for each failure to disclose the transaction - often exceeding the disallowed taxes.
There are business owners who owe $6,000 in taxes but have been assessed $1.2 million in penalties. The existing cases involve many types of businesses, including doctors' offices, dental practices, grocery store owners, mortgage companies and restaurant owners. Some are trying to negotiate with the IRS. Others are not waiting. A class action has been filed and cases in several states are ongoing. The business owners claim that they were targeted by insurance companies; and their agents to purchase the plans without any disclosure that the IRS viewed the plans as abusive tax shelters. Other defendants include financial advisors who recommended the plans, accountants who failed to fill out required tax forms and law firms that drafted opinion letters legitimizing the plans, which were used as marketing tools.
A 412(i) plan is a form of defined benefit pension plan. A 419(e) plan is a similar type of health and benefits plan. Typically, these were sold to small, privately held businesses with fewer than 20 employees and several million dollars in gross revenues. What distinguished a legitimate plan from the plans at issue were the life insurance policies used to fund them. The employer would make large cash contributions in the form of insurance premiums, deducting the entire amounts. The insurance policy was designed to have a "springing cash value," meaning that for the first 5-7 years it would have a near-zero cash value, and then spring up in value.
Just before it sprung, the owner would purchase the policy from the trust at the low cash value, thus making a tax-free transaction. After the cash value shot up, the owner could take tax-free loans against it. Meanwhile, the insurance agents collected exorbitant commissions on the premiums - 80 to 110 percent of the first year's premium, which could exceed $1 million.
Technically, the IRS's problems with the plans were that the "springing cash" structure disqualified them from being 412(i) plans and that the premiums, which dwarfed any payout to a beneficiary, violated incidental death benefit rules.
Under §6707A of the Internal Revenue Code, once the IRS flags something as an abusive tax shelter, or "listed transaction," penalties are imposed per year for each failure to disclose it. Another allegation is that businesses weren't told that they had to file Form 8886, which discloses a listed transaction.
According to Lance Wallach of Plainview, N.Y. (516-938-5007), who testifies as an expert in cases involving the plans, the vast majority of accountants either did not file the forms for their clients or did not fill them out correctly.
Because the IRS did not begin to focus audits on these types of plans until some years after they became listed transactions, the penalties have already stacked up by the time of the audits.
Another reason plaintiffs are going to court is that there are few alternatives - the penalties are not appealable and must be paid before filing an administrative claim for a refund.

The suits allege misrepresentation, fraud and other consumer claims. "In street language, they lied," said Peter Losavio, a plaintiffs' attorney in Baton Rouge, La., who is investigating several cases. So far they have had mixed results. Losavio said that the strength of an individual case would depend on the disclosures made and what the sellers knew or should have known about the risks.
In 2004, the IRS issued notices and revenue rulings indicating that the plans were listed transactions. But plaintiffs' lawyers allege that there were earlier signs that the plans ran afoul of the tax laws, evidenced by the fact that the IRS is auditing plans that existed before 2004.
"Insurance companies were aware this was dancing a tightrope," said William Noll, a tax attorney in Malvern, Pa. "These plans were being scrutinized by the IRS at the same time they were being promoted, but there wasn't any disclosure of the scrutiny to unwitting customers."
A defense attorney, who represents benefits professionals in pending lawsuits, said the main defense is that the plans complied with the regulations at the time and that "nobody can predict the future."
An employee benefits attorney who has settled several cases against insurance companies, said that although the lost tax benefit is not recoverable, other damages include the hefty commissions - which in one of his cases amounted to $860,000 the first year - as well as the costs of handling the audit and filing amended tax returns.
Defying the individualized approach an attorney filed a class action in federal court against four insurance companies claiming that they were aware that since the 1980s the IRS had been calling the policies potentially abusive and that in 2002 the IRS gave lectures calling the plans not just abusive but "criminal." A judge dismissed the case against one of the insurers that sold 412(i) plans.
The court said that the plaintiffs failed to show the statements made by the insurance companies were fraudulent at the time they were made, because IRS statements prior to the revenue rulings indicated that the agency may or may not take the position that the plans were abusive. The attorney, whose suit also names law firm for its opinion letters approving the plans, will appeal the dismissal to the 5th Circuit.
In a case that survived a similar motion to dismiss, a small business owner is suing Hartford Insurance to recover a "seven-figure" sum in penalties and fees paid to the IRS. A trial is expected in August.

Last July, in response to a letter from members of Congress, the IRS put a moratorium on collection of §6707A penalties, but only in cases where the tax benefits were less than $100,000 per year for individuals and $200,000 for entities. That moratorium was recently extended until March 1, 2010.

But tax experts say the audits and penalties continue. "There's a bit of a disconnect between what members of Congress thought they meant by suspending collection and what is happening in practice. Clients are still getting bills and threats of liens," Wallach said.

"Thousands of business owners are being hit with million-dollar-plus fines. ... The audits are continuing and escalating. I just got four calls today," he said. A bill has been introduced in Congress to make the penalties less draconian, but nobody is expecting a magic bullet.

"From what we know, Congress is looking to make the penalties more proportionate to the tax benefit received instead of a fixed amount."

Lance Wallach can be reached at: LaWallach@aol.com- 516-938-5007- or www.vebaplan.com

Is your retirement plan the best for you and your company?

Is your retirement plan the best for you and your company? Is it bogged down with hidden fees? Are owners and top executives getting the benefit that they really deserve?

Recent legislation, to take effect in 2012, will require retirement plan fee transparency which will reveal the many hidden fees that have been eating away at retirement plan balances for decades. Many business owners, HR directors, and investors are in for a shock. The enactment of the Pension Protection Act dramatically increased the retirement plan benefits available to owners and top executives.

If your plan hasn't been reviewed recently, you should have it done. We can provide you with a NO COST review. Section 79 Plans Many business owners have set up tax-deferred retirement plans such as a 401(k) in order to get a tax break. While those plans do provide for a tax advantage now, they come at a heavy tax cost in retirement, when we don't have the income to offset the expense. Section 79 plans, when funded with permanent insurance, provide an excellent tax advantage for you and your business now AND tax-free access to your money later. Additionally, Section 79 plans provide life insurance in the event that a key person passes away unexpectedly. Our featured plan also includes coverage for terminal, chronic, and critical illness at no additional cost.

A Section 79 plan offers employers an opportunity to purchase life insurance for employees on a tax-advantaged basis. This type of plan offers several advantages: Executive gets to exclude a portion (35-40%) of the employer contribution from income Tax-advantaged life insurance for key employees' personal or business needs Income tax deduction at the corporate level High percentage of plan cost allocated to key employees Provides supplementary retirement income, tax-free when properly structured Attracts and retains key employees Offers a limited funding commitment Jump Start Your Retirement Savings Many small business owners reinvest every dollar they can into their business. For their efforts, they are rewarded with ownership of a successful business enterprise. But this often comes at the cost of sufficient planning for retirement. We can help you catch up by jump starting your retirement savings in the form of Leveraged Planning™. What is Leveraged Planning™?

Leveraged Planning™ offers business owners the ability to take advantage of leverage to enable the funding of specially selected insurance and annuity products for use as retirement planning strategies, wealth creation tools, components of buy/sell arrangements, and as alternatives to traditional premium financing and more. Our lending partner extends commercial loans based on the financial and business performance in a broad range of industries. From physician’s offices to metal fabrication shops, funded Leveraged Planning™ programs are well suited to a diverse array of business owners.

The proceeds of these loans are used by the business-clients to purchase life insurance and/or annuity products for the benefit of the businesses owner (or their designated beneficiary). The loan servicing is handled through the firm, thus the business owners is able to place the value of the firm in a position to benefit them or the beneficiaries directly without placing their personal assets in jeopardy.

Each life insurance and annuity product is carefully vetted to ensure that stability is the primary characteristic of any program put in place. Fast approvals, no personal guarantees and internal loan servicing are hallmarks of a program designed for this commercial market. The salesman who wrote this failed to mention that if you go into what the IRS calls a listed transaction you will get audited.