Section
79 plans are commonly known for the $50,000 free term life insurance they can
provide for employees. Less commonly known is that Section 79 plans can also
provide permanent life insurance. These plans are employee benefit plans
established under Section 79 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 79 plans are
non-qualified plans but they are tax-deductible plans for the adopting
employer.
WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF A SECTION 79 PLAN?
Section
79 plans provide life insurance benefits for employees paid for by the employer.
The life premiums paid are 100% tax-deductible to the business. The "economic
benefit" of the life insurance is reportable as taxable income for the insured
employee. Only life insurance in excess of $50,000 is reportable. The "economic
benefit" is determined using the rates under Table I ( Reg. §1.79-3(d)(2)). When
permanent insurance is used the reportable economic benefit can be as little as
60% of the actual premium paid and deducted. This can provide a tax-advantaged
way to purchase personal life insurance.
CAN ANY BUSINESS ADOPT A SECTION 79 PLAN?
Section
79 plans are only for employees. Self-employed individuals, partners and owners
of S corporations are not employees. For an owner to participate the sponsoring
employer must be a C Corporation.
MUST EVERY EMPLOYEE BE INCLUDED IN THE PLAN?
Non-discrimination
rules do apply. 70% of all full time employees must benefit, or 85% of
participants must be non-key employees. All participants must be offered the
same type and amount of benefits. Special rules apply for companies with less
than ten employees.
WHAT OPTIONS ARE TYPICALLY OFFERED IN A SECTION 79 PLAN THAT INCLUDES PERMANENT INSURANCE?
Typically,
employees are offered three options. (1) Permanent life insurance with a death
benefit that is a multiple of salary, (2) term insurance with a death benefit
that is a multiple of salary, and (3) $50,000 group term insurance. The multiple
of salary offered is usually defined by how much insurance the business owner
wants for him or herself. Everyone will be offered the same multiple of salary.
Option 1, permanent insurance, will produce the largest reportable economic
benefit added to the taxable income of the employee, Option 2 will provide a
significantly lower reportable economic benefit added to the taxable income of
the employee, and Option 3 will result in no economic benefit added to the
employee's taxable income.
These
plans are sold so insurance agents can make commissions.
section 79 life insurancae help
ReplyDeleteFor businesses with fewer than 10 employees, the law prohibits full medical underwriting of the policies that are issued ("group" underwriting is required, which is much more risky for an insurance company). Amazingly, one of the insurance companies offering these plans doesn't have the ability to issue non-medically underwritten policies. This is laughable and pathetic all at the same time.
Why are the finances of Section 79 Plans so marginal? Section 79 Plans are up to 40 percent deductible because the life insurance policy purchased is a crummy policy by design. That's right, by design, the policy is a terrible cash accumulator. The better the policy, the less the deduction. A good policy, Retirement Life(TM), for example, would receive only a 5 percent to 8 percent deduction through the plan.
section 79 plan help www.taxaudit419.com google aln lancewallach v for section 79 help
ReplyDeleteFor businesses with fewer than 10 employees, the law prohibits full medical underwriting of the policies that are issued ("group" underwriting is required, which is much more risky for an insurance company). Amazingly, one of the insurance companies offering these plans doesn't have the ability to issue non-medically underwritten policies. This is laughable and pathetic all at the same time.
Why are the finances of Section 79 Plans so marginal? Section 79 Plans are up to 40 percent deductible because the life insurance policy purchased is a crummy policy by design. That's right, by design, the policy is a terrible cash accumulator. The better the policy, the less the deduction. A good policy, Retirement Life(TM), for example, would receive only a 5 percent to 8 percent deduction through the plan.
This paper reviews Section 79 and the potential
ReplyDeletechallenges facing employers regarding the structure
of their employee benefit plans. Without a properly
structured plan, employees may be responsible
for paying federal taxes on imputed income, and
employers may be faced with substantial additional
administrative work and costs in calculating imputed
income.
IRS regulations require that imputed income be
reported as it is incurred through the year. Therefore,
it must be incorporated in payroll during the course of
the year. Imputed income may not simply be included
in the year-end W-2. Imputed income is also subject to
regular payroll taxes including FICA.
Many large employers offer a group life insurance
plan to employees that include basic and voluntary life
insurance on employees and voluntary life insurance
on dependents. It is common knowledge that ‘imputed
income’ under Section 79 of the Internal Revenue
Code must be calculated on employer-paid basic life
insurance in excess of $50,000.1
However, employers
may not know that under certain circumstances,
imputed income calculations must also consider
voluntary life insurance on employees. Employers
also may not realize that under certain circumstances
imputed income must be calculated for voluntary
life insurance on dependents. For the reasons
outlined previously, most employers do not wish to
calculate imputed income on voluntary life insurance
on employees or dependents and careful forward
planning is therefore essential.
Wednesday, January 8, 2014
WHAT IS A SECTION 79 PLAN?
Section 79 plans are commonly known for the $50,000 free term life insurance they can provide for employees. Less commonly known is that Section 79 plans can also provide permanent life insurance. These plans are employee benefit plans established under Section 79 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 79 plans are non-qualified plans but they are tax-deductible plans for the adopting employer.
Journal of Accountancy Large Logo
ReplyDeleteHome > September 2008 > Abusive Insurance and Retirement Plans
ShareThis | Print Article Print
TAX / EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Abusive Insurance and Retirement Plans
Single–employer section 419 welfare benefit plans are the latest incarnation in insurance deductions the IRS deems abusive
BY LANCE WALLACH
SEPTEMBER 2008
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Some of the listed transactions CPA tax practitioners are most likely to encounter are employee benefit insurance plans that the IRS has deemed abusive. Many of these plans have been sold by promoters in conjunction with life insurance companies.
As long ago as 1984, with the addition of IRC §§ 419 and 419A, Congress and the IRS took aim at unduly accelerated deductions and other perceived abuses. More recently, with guidance and a ruling issued in fall 2007, the Service declared as abusive certain trust arrangements involving cash-value life insurance and providing post-retirement medical and life insurance benefits.
Notices 2007-83 and 2007-84
IRS tax relief firm, Lance Wallach, speaking
ReplyDeleteTuesday, March 11, 2014
Abusive Insurance and Retirement Plans
Abusive Insurance and Retirement Plans
As an expert witness Lance Wallach side has never lost a case
MONDAY, APRIL 22, 2013
Sometimes the IRS might disagree with planning you did with other advisors and you need to find help to ensure that your rights are protected, the facts are interpreted accurately and the law applied correctly. Lance Wallach is among the few in this country who fully understand the mechanics and legal issues surrounding what has become known as “419 Pl
26 U.S. Code § 412 - Minimum funding standards
ReplyDeleteCurrent through Pub. L. 113-86, except 113-79. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
US Code
Notes
Updates
PREV | NEXT
(a) Requirement to meet minimum funding standard
(1) In general
A plan to which this section applies shall satisfy the minimum funding standard applicable to the plan for any plan year.
(2) Minimum funding standard
For purposes of paragraph (1), a plan shall be treated as satisfying the minimum funding standard for a plan year if—
(A) in the case of a defined benefit plan which is not a multiemployer plan, the employer makes contributions to or under the plan for the plan year which, in the aggregate, are not less than the minimum required contribution determined under section 430 for the plan for the plan year,
(B) in the case of a money purchase plan which is not a multiemployer plan, the employer makes contributions to or under the plan for the plan year which are required under the terms of the plan, and
Lance Wallach
ReplyDeleteShared publicly - Mar 20, 2014
#IRS
Internal Revenue Code Section 79
www.section79.info/
Internal Revenue Code Section 79, Tax Deductible Permanent Life Insurance Plans, and Tax Deductible Group Term Life Insurance.
Lance Wallach shared this on Google+
Twitter
ReplyDeleteFacebook
RSS
LinkedIn
Sign Up
eNewsletters
Magazines
Home
Life Insurance
Annuities
Health Insurance
Markets
Your Practice
Brokerage
Sales & Marketing
Regulatory
Practice Management
Social Media
Magazines
Resource Center
Click here to find out more!
FROM THE OCTOBER 01, 2010 ISSUE OF AGENT’S SALES JOURNAL • SUBSCRIBE!
How to Avoid IRS Fines for You and Your Clients
BY LANCE WALLACH
OCTOBER 26, 2010 • REPRINTS
412i 419 sect 79 lawsuits audits www.lancewallach.com for ...
ReplyDeleteatlanta.craigslist.org › ... › atlanta › all gigs › event gigs
Craigslist Inc.
Mar 13, 2014 - 412i 419 abusive tax shelters IRS audits, lawsuits, Lance Wallach will help www.vebaplan.com 419, 412i ... Norm Bevan Michael Sonnenberg
You've visited this page 5 times. Last visit: 4/8/14
welfare benefit plan 419 lawsuit audit www.vebaplan.com ...
irstaxprobs.blogspot.com/.../welfare-benefit-plan-419-lawsuit-audit_24.h...
Jan 24, 2014 - Norm Bevan Michael Sonnenberg Dan Carpenter Anthony Fakouri Steve Burgess Robin Weingast "SADI Trust" Lance Wallach will help fix the ...
Lance Wallach +1'd this
CJA and associates 419 412i section 79 scam audits lawsuits
seniorabuses.blogspot.com/.../cja-and-associates-419-412i-sectio...
by Lance Wallach - in 61 Google+ circles
Nov 27, 2012 - CJA and associates 419 412i section 79 scam audits lawsuits ... Hartstein""Dennis Cunning""Steve Toth""Michael Sonnenberg"Larry Bell""Scott ...
You +1'd this
419 412i plans IRS audits lawsuits Lance Wallach director ...
https://plus.google.com/.../posts/YsAcF3vpRap
Lance Wallach
Mar 20, 2014 - Names of People who SOLD: "Kenny Hartstein""Dennis Cunning""Steve Toth""Michael Sonnenberg"Larry Bell""Scott Ridge""Randall Smith""Greg Roper""Tracy ...
412i 419 sect 79 lawsuits audits www.lancewallach.com for help (plainview)
ReplyDelete© craigslist - Map data © OpenStreetMap
(google map) (yahoo map)
compensation: no pay
Lance Wallach helps with 419 problems. 412i 419 abusive tax shelters IRS audits, lawsuits, Lance Wallach will help www.vebaplan.com
419, 412i, IRS audits, Lance Wallach, Google him helps, The following had something to do with this.
Dennis Cunning Steve Toth Randall Smith Paul Kaplan Herb Green Casey Hermansen
Larry Bell Scott Ridge Judy Carsrud Jeffrey Glasberg Herb McDowel
Greg Roper Joseph Donnelly
Norm Bevan Michael Sonnenberg
r Anthony Fakouri
Steve Burgess
Robin Weingast
IRS audits 419 412i captive insurance and section 79 plans. Lance Wallach will help you.
IRS audits section 79 419 412i plans. www.lancewallach.com for help
, IRS raids, Niche, Robin Weingast, Lance Wallach helps, Sadi trust, grist Mill trust, nova 419 welfare benefit plan problems and how Lance Wallach helps.www.vebaplan.com for more help. Sea Nine VEBA, 419, 412i, IRS audits,Sea Nine VEBAl Trust are all audited by the IRS and people in them probably need help.
Sea Nine VEBA, 419,412i are all IRS audit targets. Lance Wallach can help, www.tazaudit419.com
419, 412i, IRS audits, Lance Wallach, Google him helps, The following had something to do with this. Author to write about these problems.
Dennis Cunning Steve Toth Randall Smith Paul Kaplan Herb Green Casey Hermansen
Larry Bell Scott Ridge Judy Carsrud Jeffrey Glasberg Herb McDowel
Greg Roper Joseph Donnelly
Norm Bevan Michael Sonnenberg
Anthony Fakouri
Steve Burgess
Robin Weingast
Trust" Lance Wallach will help fix the problems that people have that are or were in the plans.
"Professional Benefits Trust" PBI
"Sea Nine Veba"
Bisys
The "Beta Plan"
The "Millennium Plan"
Niche
The "Ridge Plan"
The "Compass Welfare Benefit Plan"
"Section 79 Plans"
"Captive Insurance"
and other similar "412i retirement plans" and "419 welfare benefit plans
Lance Wallach, www.taxaudit419.com will help you with these problems and more like section 79, captive insurance lawsuits and IRS audits. People in the section 79 plans 419 welfare benefit plans captive insurance and 412i pension plans are getting audited by the IRS and then they sue. Google Lance Wallach for help with this. If you need help Lance Wallach as an expert witness has never lost a case. You need help NOW.
Customers of James Cunningham d/b/a Cunningham Financial or CFG Consulting LLC? We want to speak with you!
IRS audits and lawsuits result from 419 412i captive insurance and section 79 plans. As an expert witness Lance Wallach has never lost a case.
.
ReplyDeleteReporting by U.S. Persons Holding Foreign Financia
Contact Information
Email :
LanWalla@aol.com
Phone :
516-983-5007
Address :
Lance Wallach
www.taxaudit419.com
www.vebaplan.org
IRS Form 8938
FATCA requires any U.S. person holding foreign financial assets with an aggregate value exceeding $50,000 to report certain information about those assets on a new form (Form 8938) that must be attached to the taxpayers annual tax return. Reporting applies for assets held in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Failure to report foreign financial assets on Form 8938 will result in a penalty of $10,000 (and a penalty up to $50,000 for continued failure after IRS notification). Further, underpayments of tax attributable to non-disclosed foreign financial assets will be subject to an additional substantial understatement penalty of 40 percent.
Under FATCA, U.S. taxpayers holding financial assets outside the United States must report those assets to the IRS on a new form attached to their tax return. Penalties apply for failure to comply with this new reporting requirement. Reporting is require
Lawyer IRS Audits ,FBAR<OVDI,419,412i,captive Ins ...
ReplyDeletewww.lawyer4audits.com/
IRS audits, lawyers, EX IRS CPAs, and finance experts help resolve IRS audit problems including 412i, 419e,benefit plans,captive,listed and reportable ...
You shared this on Google+
Material Advisors & 419 Plans Litigation
ReplyDelete412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance based plans deemed reportable or listed transactions by the IRS.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Lance Wallach National Society of Accountants Speaker of The Year
Posted by Lance Wallach at 10:58 AM
Email This
BlogThis!
Share to Twitter
Share to Facebook
Share to Pinterest
Labels: Expert Witness, Lance Wallach, Lance Wallach Expert Witness, Taxaudits
15 comments:
Lance WallachJuly 31, 2013 at 8:31 AM
412i IRS audits, listed transactions
________________________________________
April 24, 2012 By Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC
________________________________________
IRS auditing 412i plans
EMBED RSS | SUPER RSS |
ReplyDeleteCaptive Insurance & 419 Plans Litigation
http://lancewallachchfc.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Are you the publisher? Claim this channel
More Sharing ServicesShare on favoritesShare on deliciousShare on tumblrShare on gmailShare on bloggerShare on redditShare on linkedin
Embed this content in your HTML
Search
Report adult content:
click to rate:
Account: (login)
More Channels
Showcase
RSS Channel Showcase 9300070
RSS Channel Showcase 8796989
RSS Channel Showcase 4334395
RSS Channel Showcase 3596091
Channel Catalog
Subsection Catalog
Articles on this Page
section79plan.org on PagesLike section79plan.org
ReplyDeleteInternal Revenue Targeting Section 79 Plans. Are you at risk?
Most People have never heard of a Section 79 Plan because its a wealth building tool pitched by insurance agents that do not understand the math behind the plan. Captive Insurance, Listed and Reportable Transactions are all targets of IRS Auditors
Tags: SectionPlansPlanSection79planIrsInternal Revenue Code Section 79Irc Sec 79Section 79Section 79 PlanSection 79 PlansAuditIrs AuditPenaltyFine
Categories: Finances
Similarity:
22.6%section79plan.org
section79plans.org on PagesLike section79plans.org
Internal Revenue Targeting Section 79 Plans. Are you at risk?
Most People have never heard of a Section 79 Plan because its a wealth building tool pitched by insurance agents that do not understand the math behind the plan. Captive Insurance, Listed and Reportable Transactions are all targets of IRS Auditors
Tags: SectionIrsPlansRevenueRiskInternal Revenue Code Section 79Irc Sec 79Section 79Section 79 PlanSection 79 PlansAuditIrs AuditPenaltyFine
ReplyDeleteACCOUNTING TODAY JUNE 19-JULY 9 ISSUE
FINANCIAL PLANNING News and strategies for the personal financial planner
by Lance Wallach
____________________________________________________________________________________________
IRS Auditing 412(i) Plans
IRS Auditing 412(i) Plans
recently been auditing 412(i)
defined-benefit pension plans.
They are seeking substantial taxes and
penalties from what they characterize as
“abusive plans,” but they do not regard all 412
(i) plans as necessarily abusive. A properly
structured and administered 412(i) plan can
be an invaluable tax reduction tool for a
business, but care must be taken.
In addition, the IRS is stepping up its
examinations of companies’ retirement plans
this year, aiming to catch those that are
cheating their workers or the government,
and to ensure that the plans meet federal
regulations. The offerings to be examined
include traditional pensions, 401(k)s and
profit-sharing plans.
A few years ago, when I spoke at the national
convention of the American Society of
Pension Professionals and Actuaries about
VEBAs, the IRS spoke about their 412(i)
concerns. Since then, they have escalated
their challenges to “abusive” 412(i) plans. In
fact, certain plans are on the IRS list of
abusive tax transactions.
Taxpayers who participate in “listed
transactions” are required to report them to
the IRS or face substantial penalties
($100,000 in the case of individuals, and
$200,000 in the case of entities). In addition,
“material advisors” to these plans are required
to maintain certain records and turn them
over to the IRS on demand.
When I addressed the 2005 annual
convention of the National Society of Public
Accountants, the IRS spoke about Circular
230. My impression was that if an
accountant signed a tax return that disclosed
involvement in a listed and/or abusive tax
transaction, there could be Circular 230
implications.
Most accountants are not familiar with 412(i)
plans. They are a type of defined-benefit
pension plan that allows a large contribution.
The funding vehicles are usually fixed
annuities and fixed life insurance. They are
traditionally sold by life insurance
professionals and financial planners.
Given the substantial taxes and penalties that
may be assessed if the IRS concludes that a
412(i) plan has not been properly structured
or administered,
-------------------------------------
The IRS is aiming to catch
companies that are cheating their
workers or the government.
-------------------------------------
especially if it concludes that the plan is a
listed transaction, it is important that the
taxpayer know the rules.
The accountant should also be aware of them.
The fact that a plan is being sold by an
insurance company does not make it safer.
Recently the IRS has taken action against
plans sold by insurance companies.
Lance Wallach, National Society of
Accountants Speaker of the Year and member
of the AICPA faculty of teaching
professionals, is a frequent speaker on
retirement plans, financial and estate
planning, and abusive tax shelters. He writes
about 412(i), 419, and captive insu
Keep a watchful eye
ReplyDeleteTax avoidance can lurk in employee benefit plans
By Lance Wallach, CLU, ChFC
As the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) continues to crack down on abusive retirement and employee benefit plans, many accountants will almost certainly, though inadvertently, land their clients and themselves in trouble.
Two particular types of arrangements top the IRS list of abusive plans: the so-called 419 insurance welfare benefit plan and the 412(i) defined benefit retirement plan. These popular plans, while ostensibly for the benefit of employees, are popular with employers mainly because they can offer large tax deductions. The IRS believes those deductions are often disproportionate to the economic realities of these transactions. Both plans are usually sold by insurance agents who are motivated principally by the large commissions that flow from the sale of the insurance policies within these plans.
Some of these plans have been designated as listed transactions by the IRS. Of particular interest is a spurt of IRS regulation in late 2007 that severely affected welfare benefit plans. Any participant in a listed transaction must file Form 8886 with the IRS to disclose participation in such a transaction. Failure to file can result in penalties of up to $100,000 for individuals and $200,000 for corporations. "Material advisors" to participants in such transactions, whom many CPAs are, must file Form 8918 to disclose their role. Failure to file leads to the same penalties that apply to taxpayer participants.
Other plans attempt to take advantage of exceptions to qualified asset account limits, such as sham union plans that try to exploit the exception for separate welfare benefit funds under collective-bargaining agreements provided by IRC § 419A(f)(5). Others try to take advantage of exceptions for plans serving 10 or more employers, once popular under section 419A(f)(6). More recently, one may encounter plans relying on s
Expert Witness Directory
ReplyDeleteCustomer Login
List Your Company
FOLLOW US
Google+
Home
Expert Witnesses
Medical Expert Witnesses
Forensic Experts
Litigation Support
Legal Services
Speakers
Publications
By Expert Witnesses
By Medical Expert Witnesses
Marketing for Expert Witness
Guidelines
Guide to Expert Testimony
Forensic Science
Mediation
Submit Article
Sign In
Contact
printsubmit an articlerecent articlesback
s or claim tax deductions continue to p
Lance Wallach Life Insurance
ReplyDeleteFriday, March 28, 2014
Life Insurance
In many of Lance Wallachs CPE books he discusses 412i or 412e3 and listed transactions.
One day when you were complaining about what you pay the government, your cousin Tilly suggested that she knew a life insurance agent who could help you with your taxes. You met with him, you listened to his pitch about a deferred benefit plan, and you asked a lot of questions. He suggested a 412i plan, whatever that is. From the initial description it sounded as if you would have to fund retirement for your rotating staff which you weren’t interested in doing, but he told you that he could arrange an executive carve out. You really didn’t have the income to fund it initially but he convinced you to sell your investment real estate, declare your gain as ordinary income, and then buy the plan to offset that.
You’ve been hearing that the IRS is after “listed transactions” and you’re worried. Suddenly you’re having a tough time having cousin Tilly’s friend return your calls. The insurance company whose products fund your plan has taken your calls, but for the fourth time in as many months a representative has promised to get back to you. Honest he will!
You have gone to a new accountant and you learn tha
Section 79 Plans
ReplyDelete412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance reportable or listed transactions by the IRS,Section 79, Section 79 Lawsuits,412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance based plans deemed reportable or listed transactions by the IRS.Benistar,412i Lawsuits,419 lawsuits,412i Help,419 Help, IRS Audits,412i Problems,412i problems, Expert Witness Lance Wallach,412i Help,419 Help, Benistar Lawsuits, 412i lawsuits,419 lawsuits,
Thursday, February 27, 2014
Section 79 by Lance Wallach, expert witness.
For businesses with 10 or fewer employees, the law prohibits full medical underwriting of the policies that are issued ("group" underwriting is required, which is much more risky for an insurance company).
Beginning this article, I wanted to reiterate my comments on implementing plans with fewer than 10 employees.
Amazingly, one of the insurance companies offering this plan seemly doesn't have the ability to issue non-medical underwriting policies. This is laughable and pathetic all at the same time, and a plan you'll want to stay far away from.
As I briefly alluded to in my previous article, one of the reasons I really do not like Section 79 plans is that they basically force employers and those helping them set up Section 79 plans to lie to the employees when implementing the plan.
Non-discrimination
Section 79 plans are employee benefits plans. As such, employers are not supposed to discriminate in favor of key employees or business owners.
As you know, Section 79 plans are implemented so business owners can take a business deduction for the purchase of an individually owned life insurance policy that the owner can borrow from tax free in retirement.
It sounds great until you break down the math and understand that a client would be better off paying taxes on his/her money, taking it home, and funding a good cash value life policy rather than the low cash accumulation Section 79 Plan policy.
Notwithstanding the math behind Section 79 plans, let's talk about the benefits for employees. The employee owner is going to buy a "permanent" policy that will carry cash and can be borrowed from tax free in retirement.
That same policy must be offered
Help with Common IRS Problems
ReplyDeleteTuesday, March 11, 2014
As an expert witness Lance Wallach side has never lost a case: Sometimes the IRS might disagree with planning you...
As an expert witness Lance Wallach side has never lost a case: Sometimes the IRS might disagree with planning you...: Sometimes the IRS might disagree with planning you did with other advisors and you need to find help to ensure that your rights are protec...
ReplyDeleteWhere can I get Help with Section 79 Plan Problem?
Lance Wallach
Lance Wallach
Subscribe 8
Add to
Share
Hootlet
More
145 views
3 1
Published on Oct 12, 2012
http://section79plan.org
Where can I get Help with Section 79 Plan Problem?
Hello, I'm Lance Wallach...the leading authority in helping
people with Section 79 Plan Problems.
Google "Lance Wallach Section 79" for proof!
For free 15 minute phone consultation call me at: 516-938-5007
and make the Section 79 Plan Problem go away
Bogleheads.org
ReplyDeleteInvesting Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle
Skip to content
Forum search • Advanced site search
Board index ‹ Personal Finance (Not Investing)
Change font size
Print view
WikiAmazon.comSupport this SiteForum PolicyFAQRegisterLogin
Section 79 Plan as a tax reduction strategy?
Post a reply
6 posts • Page 1 of 1
Section 79 Plan as a tax reduction strategy?
Postby daw007 » Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:17 pm
I was curious if anyone was familiar with Section 79 Insurance plans as a method to help reduce tax burden?
I was counseled regarding this recently and was doing research online.
Google doesn't have too many links regarding this and seems to split between those calling it a huge scam and other saying it may be worth checking out but it's pretty complex to perform.
daw007
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:58 pm
Top
Re: Section 79 Plan as a tax reduction strategy?
Postby Johm221122 » Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:27 am
If you want advice, posting this way may help
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6212
Life insurance is for protection, not investing.Use term and invest the rest
John
Johm221122
Posts: 4850
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:27 pm
Top
Re: Section 79 Plan as a tax reduction strategy?
Postby dhodson » Thu Nov 08, 2012 8:37 am
You should avoid this and the other BS insurance ideas such as 412i and 412e plans.
In essence the tax deduction only means less money in your pocket in the end and more for the agent. I could say if you wanted to reduce taxes that you could just donate more to charity but of course that doesnt get at your real goal of having more money in the end. With these plans, you do pay less taxes and thats about the only good thing one can say about it. If you hate the government or something like that then sure it will give uncle sam less but dont believe the hype that its good for you in the long term. This is an incomplete blog about it.
http://www.producersweb.com/r/WPI/d/con ... e2c88c45db
NEVER buy permananet insurance as an investment.
dhodson
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 3:03 pm
Top
Re: Section 79 Plan as a tax reduction strategy?
Postby daw007 » Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:27 pm
I appreciate the input. The I hadn't heard too much about Section 79 and it did seem a little fishy overall.
daw007
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:58 pm
Top
Re: Section 79 Plan as a tax reduction strategy?
Postby bluemarlin08 » Fri Nov 09, 2012 9:22 pm
Section 79 was a very popular tool in the early 80's. One could structure a plan where the owners could fund life insurance in a tax deductible fashion using a product known as retired lives reserve.
bluemarlin08
Posts: 1516
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:18 pm
Top
Re: Section 79 Plan as a tax reduction strategy?
Postby dhodson » Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:16 am
but like the other plans i mentioned, abusive behavior was done and the irs had to get involved. They pop up now and again when insurance companies think people have forgotten the past.
all of these ideas of letting the tax angle force you into bad "investments" work out for the agent but rarely the client