Tuesday, May 30, 2017

What are the nondiscrimination tests for group term life insurance plans?1

What are the nondiscrimination tests for group term life insurance plans?1
Group term life insurance provided under the Trust that is subject to its own nondiscrimination provisions under Code Section 79(d) does not need to comply with the general VEBA tests, but must meet the Code Section 79 special standards for that benefit. The statue provides that a plan may not discriminate in favor of "key employees" with respect to eligibility or benefits.

A plan will not meet the eligiblity nondiscrimination requirements for life insurance benefits unless one of the following tests is met:
  • The plan must benefit 70% or more of all employees of the employer;
  • At least 85% of all participants in the plan are non-key employees;
  • The plan benefits such employees as qualify under a classification set up by the employer and found by the Secretary of Treasury not to be discriminatory in favor of key employees; or
  • The plan is part of a cafeteria plan and the requirements for cafeteria plans are met.
A plan will not meet the benefits nondiscrimination requirements for life insurance benefits unless all benefits available to participants who are key employees are available to all other participants. Life insurance benefits will not be considered discriminatory merely because the benefits available bear a uniform relationship to the compensation of the employees covered. The dollar limit cap on compensation used to determine whether VEBA benefits are discriminatory does not apply to group life insurance plans. For purposes of this test, the term "employee" includes former employees.

What employees can be excluded from the Code Section 79 life insurance tests?
For purposes of the eligibility life insurance test, the following employees may be excluded:
  • Employees who have not completed 3 years of service;
  • Part-time or seasonal employees;
  • Employees who are included in a collective bargaining unit where the plan has been the subject of good faith bargaining between employee representatives and the employer; and
  • Employees who are nonresident aliens and who receive no earned income from the employer that constitutes income from sources within the United States.
Who is a "key employee"?
A "key employee" for purposes of the Code Section 79 life insurance nondiscrimination rules generally is an employee who is:
  • An officer with an annual compensation greater than a dollar limit.6 The number of officer/key employees is limited to the greater of 3 or 10% of employees. In no event shall the number of officer/key employees be more than 50;
  • An owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 5% of the employer; or
  • An owner, directly or indirectly, or more than 5% of the employer and has an annual compensation from the employer of more than $150,000.
A key employee also includes any former employee if such employee when he or she retired or separated from service was a key employee.
What happens to a life insurance plan that does not meet the Code Section 79 nondiscrimination testing requirements?
If the life insurance does not satisfy the nondiscriminationn requirements, the $50,000 worth of life insurance that otherwise would be provided on a tax-free basis instead will be includible in the income of the key employees benefiting under the life insurance plan.

15 comments:

  1. The leading expert on Employee Benefit plans (VEBA, 419, 412i, 501c); Life insurance, Estates, Trusts & Pensions
    20+ Years Professional Experience
    Member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals
    Published 50+ national publications
    Chartered Life Underwriter
    Chartered Financial Consultant
    AICPA Author & Instructor

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sign In Create Accountc 06 2010 09:38 AM

    This topic is locked This topic is locked
    2 replies to this topic
    #1 IRS attacks 412i plans: post #1 VEBAPLAN
    Registered User

    Registered
    96 posts
    Posted 06 December 2010 - 09:38 AM
    [Deleted; Lance, I am not comfortable with a message on the message boards that includes a reprint of an email from an IRS employee that was not intended by the author to be public. -- David Baker, message boards administrator]
    Lance Wallach, CLU, ChFC, CIMC, speaks and writes extensively about VEBAs, retirement plans, and tax reduction strategies. H

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dolan Media Newswires 01/22/2010
    Small Business Retirement Plans Fuel Litigation
    Small businesses facing audits and potentially huge tax penalties over certain types of retirement plans are filing lawsuits against those who marketed, designed and sold the plans. The 412(i) and 419(e) plans were marketed in the past several years as a way for small business owners to set up retirement or welfare benefits plans while leveraging huge tax savings, but the IRS put them on a list of abusive tax shelters and has more recently focused audits on them.
    The penalties for such transactions are extremely high and can pile up quickly - $100,000 per individual and $200,000 per entity per tax year for each failure to disclose the transaction - often exceeding the disallowed taxes.
    There are business owners who owe $6,000 in taxes but have been assessed $1.2 million in penalties. The existing cases involve many types of businesses, including doctors' offices, dental practices, grocery store owners, mortgage companies and restaurant owners. Some a

    ReplyDelete
  4. Veba Health Care

    THURSDAY, AUGUST 1, 2013
    Veba Health Care: Examination Guidelines - Organizational Requiremen...
    Veba Health Care: Examination Guidelines - Organizational Requiremen...: 4.76.18.3.1.1 (06-21-2002) 1. Review the trust agreement, or other organizational document, and obtain answers to the following question...
    Posted by Lance Wallach at 9:52 AM
    Email This
    BlogThis!
    Share to Twitter
    Share to Facebook
    Share to Pinterest

    Labels: Lance Wallach, Lance Wallach Expert Witness, veba, Veba Health Care
    5 comments:

    Lance WallachJanuary 9, 2014 at 8:46 AM
    vebahealth care

    Lance WallachJanuary 7, 2014 at 10:29 AM
    sea nine veba kenneth elliott help with lancae wallach

    ReplyDelete

    Lance WallachMarch 20, 2014 at 7:05 AM
    6707A Penalties & 419 Plans Litigation
    412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance based plans deemed reportable or listed transactions by the IRS.

    Friday, March 30, 2012

    Court CaseSea Nine Veba
    As an expert witness in this case the claims against Lance Wallach’s client was dismissed.
    Lance Wallach’s side has never lost a case.


    J&M ASSOCIATES, INC. v. CALLAHAN

    ReplyDelete
  5. Visit the Singapore Government Website
    Contact Info | Feedback | FAQs
    Item Details


    Find in Library
    Protecting clients from fraud, incompetence, and scams / Lance Wallach.

    Author: Wallach, Lance.
    Publisher: Hoboken, N.J. : Wiley, c2010.
    ISBN: 9780470539743 (cloth)
    Format: Books
    Physical Description: xv, 224 p. ;24 cm.
    Subjects: Fraud Prevention

    ReplyDelete
  6. Veba Health Care .com
    A Veba Plan LLC site
    Home
    Contact Us
    VEBA Articles by Lance Wallach
    VEBA Articles by Lance Wallach
    Reduce Other Post-Employment Benefits Liability with a VEBA
    Accounting Today June 16, 2008
    By Lance Wallach
    Other Post-Employment Benefits
    In 1994, the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) established standards for public employee pension plans. Government and public employers have to report and account for pension benefits costs.
    However, until recent years, there was no such standard in place for other post-employment benefits (OPEBs) for state and local government workers.

    Private sector employers have been required to report OPEBs for over 15 years under the FASB Standards106/158.

    Government and public sector employers have been required to report OPEBs since August 2004 after the issuance of GASB Statement 45. This means that all government employers must now keep their promise of providing retiree benefits. They need to be calculated accurately, accrued during the employee’s years of work with the employer, and recognized as a financial obligation as OPEB costs. These costs are to be reported on financial statements of large public sector employers beginning with the first financial report period after December 15, 2006, and on small employers beginning in 2008.
    ority of public sector employers, with more than 200 employees, offer some

    ReplyDelete
  7. Section 79 plan
    Section 79 of the Internal Revenue Code [1] details the tax consequences and requirements for corporations wishing to install a group-term life insurance plan. Permanent life insurance may also be offered as an added benefit in a Section 79 plan. Section 79 plans are non-qualified as defined by the Internal Revenue Code, but still offer a tax deduction for sponsoring employers.[2]

    Employees participating in a Section 79 plan offered by a sponsoring corporation may receive up to $50,000 in group term life insurance at no cost, if the plan is non-discriminatory. Any amount over this limit is deemed a 'permanent benefit'. The employee should realize a portion of the permanent benefit as W-2 taxable income, and pay any applicable taxes accordingly. Contributions to a Section 79 plan are tax-deductible, though for owner(s), and 2% or more shareholders, contributions are only deductible if paid by, and from, a C Corporation.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Section 79 Plans
    412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance reportable or listed transactions by the IRS,Section 79, Section 79 Lawsuits,412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance based plans deemed reportable or listed transactions by the IRS.Benistar,412i Lawsuits,419 lawsuits,412i Help,419 Help, IRS Audits,412i Problems,412i problems, Expert Witness Lance Wallach,412i Help,419 Help, Benistar Lawsuits, 412i lawsuits,419 lawsuits,

    Wednesday, July 3, 2013

    IRS Attacks Business Owners in 419, 412, Section 79 and...
    Massachusetts Society of Certified Public Accountants, Inc.
    Winter 2010

    IRS Attacks Business Owners in 419, 412, Section 79 and Captive Insurance Plans Under Section 6707A

    By Lance Wallach

    Taxpayers who previously adopted 419, 412i, captive insurance or Section 79 plans are in big trouble.

    In recent years, the IRS has identified many of these arrangements as abusive devices to funnel tax deductible dollars to shareholders and classified these arrangements as listed transactions." These plans were sold by insurance agents, financial planners, accountants and attorneys seeking large life insurance commissions. In general, taxpayers who engage in a “listed transaction” must report such transaction to the IRS on Form 8886 every year that they “participate” in the transaction, and you do not necessarily have to make a contribution or claim a tax deduction to participate. Section 6707A of the Code imposes severe penalties for failure to file Form 8886 with respect to a listed transaction. But you are also in trouble if you file incorrectly. I have received numerous phone calls from business owners who filed and still got fined. Not only do you have to file Form 8886, but it also has to be prepared correctly. I only know of two people in the U.S. who have filed these forms properly for clients. They tell me that was after hundreds of hours of research and over 50 phones calls to various IRS personnel. The filing instructions for Form 8886 presume a timely filling. Most people file late and follow the directions for currently preparing the forms. Then the IRS fines the business owner. The tax court does not have jurisdiction to abate or lower such penalties imposed by the IRS.

    "Many taxpayers who are no longer taking current tax deductions for these plans continue to enjoy the benefit of previous tax deductions by continuing the defe

    ReplyDelete
  9. Expert Witness Directory
    Customer Login
    List Your Company
    FOLLOW US
    Google+
    Home
    Expert Witnesses
    Medical Expert Witnesses
    Forensic Experts
    Litigation Support
    Legal Services
    Speakers
    Publications
    By Expert Witnesses
    By Medical Expert Witnesses
    Marketing for Expert Witness
    Guidelines
    Guide to Expert Testimony
    Forensic Science
    Mediation
    Submit Article
    Sign In
    Contact
    printsubmit an articlerecent articlesback


    Find an Expert Witness:
    IRS to Audit Sea Nine VEBA Participating Employers

    By Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC Abusive Tax Shelter, Listed Transaction, Reportable Transaction Expert Witness

    PhoneCall Lance Wallach at (516) 938-5007
    The IRS may be auditing many more participating employers in the coming months.
    In recent months, I have received phone calls from participants in the Sea Nine VEBA and have learned that the IRS may be auditing many more participating employers in the coming months. To better assist current Sea Nine clients and those that are now or may be under audit in the future, my associates who are CPAs, tax attys and former IRS employees will continue to help with the Sea Nine VEBA victims and others in 419 412i captive insurance and section 79 scams and answer the following:

    • What is the IRS’s position with respect to the Sea Nine VEBA,419 captive insurance and section 79 scams?

    • What will be the likely result of my audit?

    • What if I don't agree with my audit results?

    • What are other participants doing with respect to the audits?

    • Will the IRS impose interest and penalties?

    • What is a “listed transaction” ?

    • What is Form 8886, and what are the penalties for failing to file Form 8886?

    • Will I be responsible even if I relied on my tax advisor?

    • What recourse do I have against those that promoted and sold the Sea Nine VEBA?

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Lance Wallach
    Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, international tax, and other subjects. He writes about FBAR,OVDI, international taxation, captive insurance plans and other topics. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Pubic Radio’s All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots.

    Copyright Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC

    More information about Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC


    While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this publication, it is not intended to provide legal advice as individual situations will differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer. For specific technical or legal advice on the information provided and related topics, please contact the author.

    ReplyDelete

  10. An organization to help those harmed by the IRS
    Home
    ISSUES
    THIS CAN HAPPEN TO YOU.
    More Articles
    Contact Us
    68 Keswick Lane Plainview NY 11803 us 5169385007 vebaplan@gmail.com
    HomeContact UsTHIS CAN HAPPEN TO YOU.More ArticlesISSUES
    IRS Audited plaintiffs' plan & concluded that the plan failed to comply with 412(i)(3) because it was "overfunded".
    The IRS audited plaintiffs’ plan
    and concluded that the plan failed to comply with § 412(i)(3) because it was
    “overfunded.”

    The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently
    issued several important decisions in MDL No. 1983, a multidistrict
    litigation proceeding designed to address claims related to employee
    benefit plans created under § 412(i) and § 419 of the Internal Revenue Code. For
    example, in two similar § 419 cases, the Court reaffirmed its earlier rulings and
    dismissed plaintiffs’ fraud-based claims with prejudice. The Court concluded
    that the allegations that plaintiffs were induced to establish § 419 plans based
    on allegedly fraudulent representations that the plans would be valid and
    subject to favorable future tax consequences were simply non‑actionable
    statements of opinion or predictions of future action. The Court explained
    that because plaintiffs could identify no law or IRS guidance that made
    plaintiffs’ § 419 plan illegal when the policies were sold, “any representations
    or omissions made … about the tax benefits or legality of the plans were not
    false when made but rather non-actionable opinions or predictions regarding
    future IRS enforcement.”

    On a related note, the United States District Court for the Southern District
    of Florida recently granted the defendant insurer’s motion for final summary
    judgment in a lawsuit relating to the use of insurance policies to fund defined
    benefit pension plans under § 412(i) of the Interna

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sid Kess’ Practical Alternatives to Commonly Misused and Abused Small Business Tax Strategies: Insuring Your Client’s Future
    Author/Moderator: Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC, CIMC
    Publisher: AICPA
    Availability: In Stock
    Description
    Table of Contents
    Reviews
    Description
    A perfect follow-up to “Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots,” this course was created by the renowned Sid Kess. Learn the best strategies for reducing taxes and building, conserving and passing wealth to the next generation while at the same time avoiding abusive strategies.
    Objectives:
    • Identify practical alternatives to abusive tax shelters
    • Understand how to integrate financial products as part of a retirement plan
    • Discover how to use innovative retirement and financial programs to improve business and personal financial wealth of your clients
    • Optimize your value in the planning process between your clients and their financial advisors
    Prerequisite: None
    Accepted for CFP® credit.
    See full description
    o Course Objectives
    o Introduction
    o Organization
    Chapter 6 - Latest Developments

    ReplyDelete
  12. Wednesday, March 19, 2014
    412i-419 Plans: RAMESH SARVA: SARVA
    412i-419 Plans: RAMESH SARVA: SARVA: RAMESH SARVA: SARVA : Defendants have also directly and indirectly promoted the VEBA plan scheme to prospective participants. Sarva for his





    ...


    Search Results RAMESH SARVA: Sarva- More You Should Know ...

    https://plus.google.com/.../posts/UqB9WPjmexy‎
    Lance Wallach
    Mar 7, 2014 - RAMESH SARVA: Sarva- More You Should Know rameshsarvaveba.blogspot.com/2014/.../sarva-more-you-should-know.ht...‎ Tuesday, January 7, 2014 ... Sarva ...



    Ramesh Sarva CPA PC - Forest Hills - Forest Hills, NY | Yelp
    www.yelp.com › Financial Services › Tax Services‎
    Yelp, Inc.
    Ramesh Sarva CPA PC Forest Hills reviews by real people. Yelp is a fun and easy way to find, recommend and talk about what's great and not so great in Forest ...

    ReplyDelete





  13. Employee Retirement Plans

    By Lance Wallach
    412i, 419, Captive Insurance and Section 79 Plans; Buyer Beware

    The IRS has been attacking all 419 welfare benefit plans, many 412i retirement plans, captive insurance plans with life insurance in them, and Section 79 plans. IRS is aggressively auditing various plans and calling them “listed transactions,” “abusive tax shelters,” or “reportable transactions,” participation in any of which must be disclosed to the Service. The result has been IRS audits, disallowances, and huge fines for not properly reporting under IRC 6707A.

    In a recent tax court case, Curico v. Commissioner (TC Memo 2010-115), the Tax Court ruled that an investment in an employee welfare benefit plan marketed under the name “Benistar” was a listed transaction. It was substantially similar to the transaction described in IRS Notice 95-34. A subsequent case, McGehee Family Clinic, largely followed Curico, though it was technically decided on other grounds. The parties stipulated to be bound by CuricoMcGehee in connection with the Benistar 419 Plan and Trust were deductible. Curico did not appear to have been decided yet at the time McGehee was argued. The McGehee regarding whether the amounts paid by opinion (Case No. 10-102) (United States Tax Court, September 15, 2010) does contain an exhaustive analysis and discussion of virtually all of the relevant issues. Read more here
    IRS Audits 419, 412i, Captive Insurance Plans With Life Insurance, and Section 79 Scams

    ReplyDelete
  14. Call now for Free 5min Telephone Consultation with Lance Wallach!!

    Call our National Office 516-938-5007

    Call our National Office 516-938-5007
    Our Message Forum:


    Free Online Forum
    Click here to enter our Message Forum






    Click here to subscribe via Email
    About Mr. Wallach

    The leading expert on Employee Benefit plans (VEBA, 419, 412i, 501c); Life insurance, Estates, Trusts & Pensions
    20+ Years Professional Experience
    Member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals
    Published 50+ national publications
    Chartered Life Underwriter
    Chartered Financial Consultant
    AICPA Author & Instructor

    Search This Blog


    Blog Archive


    About Me

    My Photo
    Lance Wallach

    Lance Wallach, Managing Director, is the
    nation's leading expert on employee benefit plans,
    tax problem resolution and IRS audit defense.

    Mr. Wallach is a member of the AICPA faculty of
    teaching professionals & a renowned national
    expert in many court cases. He is the author of
    many best selling financial & law books, including:

    * "Wealth Preservation Planning" by the
    National Society of Accountants

    * "The CPA's Guide to Federal & Estate
    Gift Taxation" published by Bisk

    * The AICPA's "The team approach to Tax,
    Financial & Estate planning."

    * "The CPA's Guide to Life Insurance" by
    Bisk CPEasy

    * Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps
    and Common Abusive Small Businesss Hot
    spots by the AICPA, author/moderator
    Lance Wallach

    ReplyDelete
  15. Don’t Become A Material Advisor



    [Ed. Note - the following guest post is by Lance Wallach. The post originally appeared in Accounting Today on July 1st of this year and is being reprinted here at the request of its author.

    In his post, Lance details the dangers faced by accountants and others who prepare returns that involve abusive tax shelters. Our law firm has successfully sued a number of insurance agents, stockbrokers and others who sold these plans. Frequently these financial professionals did not know what they were selling or simply didn't care and were motivated by high (and often hidden) commissions. Whether by negligence or gre

    ReplyDelete